Of course they are both off the charts valuable and the Yankees would not have been the same without either player. They are winners and class personified on and off the field.
But here is the question: What do Raul Ibanez, Scott Brosius, Jose Viscaino, Aaron Boone, Luis Sojo, and Chad Curtis all have in common? They have all gotten huge clutch hits or home runs to win playoff and or World Series games. I specifically didn’t mention any of the major stars that have done likewise.
And lest you think anyone can get lucky once, Scott Brosius was the World Series MVP in 1998. True, you can counter that the first of five rings won by Rivera and Jeter, Rivera was the set-up man and the MVP was closer John Wetteland. Wetteland, already having notched seasons of 43 and 37 saves prior to joining the Yankees was more accomplished than any of the aforementioned hitters. But as the future unfolded, history now reflects Wettleland was far from a Rivera.
And while Jeter did win a WS MVP in 2000, (Rivera won his in 1999) there have been plenty of other stars that have helped carry the load. From Bernie Williams, Alex Rodriguez, Jorge Posada, Hideki Matsui, Tino Martinez, Darryl Strawberry, and Paul O’Neill, just to name some, Jeter has had a lot of help doing what he does as far as getting to the post season and clutch hits and game winning plays once there. Rivera has been a part of some great bullpens but for the majority of the current Yankee run, he is the closer.
Personally, I don’t get why closing is so hard. In the modern-day game it is one lousy inning most of the time. (Although Mo would often go two in the playoffs.) Clearly it is the pressure. With apologies to Trevor Hoffman who could not get it done in the postseason, part of the greatness that is Rivera is his unmatched combined consistent greatness in the regular and post season.
As iconic as Jeter is, there have been more consistently great shortstops than closers. And since there are eight position players, if you have a weak or injured star shortstop you can balance it out with the production of other players (and the DH). If you don’t have a lock down closer, you can’t hide that weakness.
In other words, if you replaced Jeter with an average shortstop, you can get offense, defense and leadership from other players. You replace Rivera with an average closer and you’re not going to win.
If you start a franchise with Mo, you don’t have to worry about closing games for fifteen years. You start a franchise with Jeter, and your offense is just beginning. Unlike Bugs Bunny, one position player can’t do it alone.
One of the things that make bad teams worse is not being able to close the games that they are leading in. One of things that make good teams great and great teams legendary can boil down to the team that has the closer versus the team that doesn’t.
The inability to close puts more pressure on starting pitchers, the offense, everyone. On the other hand, having “The Hammer of God”, in Rivera, at your disposal, is pretty comforting. It has a ripple effect beyond the limited innings a closer pitches.
When David Justice came to the Yankees he said, of his Atlanta Brave teams of the nineties, that they would have won four or five championships if they had Rivera. Even if it meant trading Chipper Jones or any one of the better position players, those Braves teams likely do better than one WS with Rivera.
It must be noted that if Jeter goes on to win more World Series’ after Rivera retires, and surpasses four thousand hits I may have to revisit.